In my opinion, it is a matter of putting the file where it belongs. So one wouldn't have to consider lsb twice when looking for something else in /etc. And, in my case, the directory is empty.
--- On Sun, 5/6/12, Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jeff Licquia <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Bug#671730: /etc/lsb-base is there. Do mv > /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh /etc/lsb-base/logging.sh > To: "Regid Ichira" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Sunday, May 6, 2012, 2:39 PM > On 05/06/2012 09:17 AM, Regid Ichira > wrote: > > I think it is more obvious, and less > cluttering /etc: > > I'm not sure how replacing a file with a directory creates > less clutter > in /etc. It would be different if there were multiple > lsb-base-* files > we could move in there. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
