On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:02:47PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello Michael, Hi Raphael,
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Michael Vogt wrote: > > Thanks a lot for testing the update. I uploaded the fixed version into > > the squeeze-lts queue now and I hope it will get accpted as a > > update. I am not entirely sure how cases like this are handled as its > > not a security update and not (strictly) a regression, but given that > > I got reports from quite a few people I would really like to see the > > fix in squeeze-lts. > > There's no "queue" in front of squeeze-lts. It works like unstable... what > you upload is immediately accepted. Thus we count on people doing > reasonable things and not uploading non-tested changes. Thanks, then all should be fine now and people have the updated version. > And the other side of the coin is that you should communicate on > debian-lts-announce why you made a specific changes. In this case, maybe > posting a DLA 58-3 would be appropriate, explaining that it fixes some > more regressions. I did that now and send a brief update to the debian-lts-announce list. Thanks, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141028083020.GQ3884@bod
