Hello Am 03.07.2015 um 13:03 schrieb Mike Gabriel: > Hi Holger, > > On Fr 03 Jul 2015 12:48:06 CEST, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, Mike Gabriel wrote: >>> The only way I can think of in terms of making this more fool proof, I >>> guess, is by rejecting mails to debian-lts-announce if >>> >>> o a used DLA has not been reserved via the secure-testing SVN repo >>> o the DLA has been reserved in the SVN repo, but for another package >> >> there is another way, which is probably easier to implement: parse >> debian-lts- >> announce mails and automatically add those DLAs to svn if that hasnt >> been done >> already. > > Yeah, I thought of this approach, as well... > > It will not always succeed, though, as there can be (normally is) a > delay between running bin/genDLA and actually sending the DLA mail. > > My delays normally are: > > o write up a nice announcement text > o possibly have lunch break inbetween > o answer someone's phone or deal with people coming into my office > > In the meantime, someone else may have run bin/genDLA as well and > actually committed the DLA number (I had that once already with Santiago). > > I guess we can capture something like 80% of the cases (which is good > already) by auto-committing DLA's that come in via the d-l-a list, but > for a 100% fix-up, we may need to bounce mails, it feels. > > Though, I am not fully sure here, just lacking imagination here. ;-) >
Can this svn commit for the DLA number not be done within bin/genDLA ? Kind regards, Christian Mack -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
