On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > Thus it would be better if we fixed packages listed in dla-needed.txt > > even if the security team tagged the same issues as no-dsa afterwards. > > > > What do you think? > > I don't know. Is the no-dsa tag aimed to prioritize tasks or to avoid to > upload unworthy changes, especially on important packages?
In general, I understand the "no-dsa" tag as, "would be nice to fix, but issue is not important enough to justifiy the workload it would impose on the security team". Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
