On Tue, 03 May 2016 at 10:47:31 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > I agree, however I suspect most people using roundcube in production are > probably using the backport... There's even a dangling backport in > wheezy right now (0.9)... a little messy.
Sorry, I meant oldstable-backports not oldstable. Packaging 1.0.x for wheezy-backports sounds much easier than backporting security patches to wheezy's 0.7.x. > I filed a bug about the dangling backport in wheezy: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813843 > > I wonder how best to deal with this: should the backport just be removed > or what? Agreed, I think 0.9 should be either removed from the archive or superseeded by 1.0.x. Cheers, -- Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
