On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:32:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Guido Günther wrote: > > I'm not happy with this either. We could try to support it on a best > > effor basis if this helps anything. I assume most people are running not > > with mostly trusted guests. > > So we got answers from the sponsors with qemu/qemu-kvm listed and most of > them would like it to be supported for longer... > > So best-effort basis is certainly better than no support at all and it's > anyway what we do with most packages...
O.k. although my contribution to KVM were years back I'm at least a bit familiar with the codebase. > BTW is there really nobody that can be hired upstream to support old > versions? I just made another attempt to reach out to QEMU developers. Cheers, -- Guido
