Hi Yes that change (revert) was intentional. I thought I did that in a previous commit.
/ Ola Sent from a phone Den 30 dec 2016 10:07 skrev "Chris Lamb" <[email protected]>: > Ola, > > Did you mean to revert the change to imagemagick here? > > > commit af43385b8d6274214af17a9ae74a6ba4c48477e0 > Author: opal <opal@e39458fd-73e7-0310-bf30-c45bca0a0e42> > Date: Thu Dec 29 22:19:13 2016 +0000 > > Swiftmailer vulnerable. > > git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/secure-testing@47569 > e39458fd-73e7-0310-bf30-c45bca0a0e42 > > diff --git a/data/dla-needed.txt b/data/dla-needed.txt > index 8b11b7aa..aea8eacd 100644 > --- a/data/dla-needed.txt > +++ b/data/dla-needed.txt > @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ ikiwiki > NOTE: have got information from the stable security team. The problem > is not > NOTE: very important according to the maintainer. > -- > +imagemagick (Emilio Pozuelo) > +-- > libav (Hugo Lefeuvre) > NOTE: Upstream should provide new point-releases fixing open security > issues in the next months. > NOTE: Lots of CVEs are open, this is going to take some time. (See > debian-lts ML) > @@ -46,6 +48,10 @@ libphp-phpmailer > NOTE: According to the release note this is a critial vulnerability so > it > NOTE: should have high priority. > -- > +libphp-swiftmailer > + NOTE: According to the release note this is a critial vulnerability so > it > + NOTE: should have high priority. > +-- > libxml-twig-perl > NOTE: no upstream fix yet for expand_external_ents but new no_xxe flag > in 3.50 > NOTE: could be backported (2016-12-13) > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk > `- >
