Hi Thorsten I would like to fix this and the work is not a burden to me whatsoever. However, at the moment I am unable to give this security issue the attention I know it deserves. So that all said, I would like to ask the LTS Team to take care of the matter. No review of their work is needed by me. I'll catch up to it after the fact.
Thank you. Kevin Coyner On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:50 AM Thorsten Alteholz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Kevin, > > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Wheezy version of tnef: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6307 > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6308 > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6309 > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6310 > > Would you like to take care of this yourself? > > If yes, please follow the workflow we have defined here: > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development > > If that workflow is a burden to you, feel free to just prepare an > updated source package and send it to [email protected] > (via a debdiff, or with an URL pointing to the source package, > or even with a pointer to your packaging repository), and the members > of the LTS team will take care of the rest. Indicate clearly whether you > have tested the updated package or not. > > If you don't want to take care of this update, it's not a problem, we > will do our best with your package. Just let us know whether you would > like to review and/or test the updated package before it gets released. > > You can also opt-out from receiving future similar emails in your > answer and then the LTS Team will take care of tnef updates > for the LTS releases. > > Thank you very much. > > Thorsten Alteholz, > on behalf of the Debian LTS team. > > PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at > any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered > on this update in this file: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/data/dla-needed.txt?view=markup > > >
