Brian May <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, agreed. Not a fan myself of this (outdated?) coding style, > constructing HTML by hand like this is prone to errors like this. Easier > to get it wrong then it is to get it right.
Also for the record, in 2006 I tested this package to fill requriments by my employment at the time. I didn't like/trust the coding quality, and looked elsewhere. I only remember this now because the security tracker has some issues that were opened in response to bugs I opened at the time. -- Brian May <[email protected]>
