Hi Antoine

My thinking was that it was easy to check how complicated a backport would
be. If we conclude that it is complicated (patches do not apply and it is
clear that code need to be re-written) then I think we can consider going
for 3.3.30 instead. What do you think?

// Ola

On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 17:22, Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 2018-10-18 11:26:04, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. We can consider updating to the 3.3.30, but I
> > suggest you first check how easy it is to backport it.
>
> What do you mean exactly? Backporting it is about as hard as figuring
> out how hard it would be to backport, no? :)
>
> A.
>
> --
> We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be
> more humane and fair than the world your governments have made
> before.
>                          - John Perry Barlow
>


-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/  [email protected]                    Folkebogatan 26            \
|  [email protected]                   654 68 KARLSTAD            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to