On 11/11/2018 23:18, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2018-11-11 23:03:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 11/11/2018 15:47, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >>> On 2018-11-11 13:21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> Hi Antoine, >>>> >>>> On 09/11/2018 20:37, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >>>>> On 2018-11-05 16:26:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 30/10/2018 16:46, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >>>>>>> Which brings us to Thunderbird (and Firefox) themselves. The last I >>>>>>> heard of this is that LLVM was NEW in jessie. I wrote Emilio to see if >>>>>>> he needed help on that last week, but haven't got a response. Hopefully >>>>>>> all that work will come to fruitition synchronously in a grand fanfare >>>>>>> of uploads all working out perfectly in the end. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry if I missed your mail. Anyway, here's an update: >>>>>> >>>>>> LLVM (and the necessary deps) were accepted. Unfortunately I run into >>>>>> some >>>>>> trouble while bootstrapping rustc and cargo. I tried some different ways >>>>>> and >>>>>> finally fixed the first one (bootstrap using upstream binaries). I am >>>>>> uploading >>>>>> the packages now and will follow up with firefox/thunderbird if all goes >>>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> Just so I see how fast I should be moving on Enigmail, when do you plan >>>>> on uploading Thunderbird? >>>> >>>> The update is ready, and the blocker was an update to stretch, which has >>>> already >>>> happen. So I believe we are ready, and this could happen anytime now. >>>> >>>> However since we don't have a working enigmail, should we delay the update >>>> until >>>> we do? Given the security issues in thunderbird and the fact that the new >>>> version has a Breaks on the old enigmail, I would say that we can go ahead >>>> with >>>> thunderbird, and enigmail can be fixed asynchronously. However if the >>>> update is >>>> not too far ahead, we could also delay this a bit longer. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> I think we could manage a resolution with Enigmail soon enough, and >>> considering how fast those updates were deployed on stretch, i don't >>> know if we have a reasonable excuse to delay those in jessie. >> >> Just to be clear, with 'those' are you referring to thunderbird, i.e. saying >> that we should release the update now, and update enigmail asynchronously? >> That >> is what I think you meant, but perhaps you were referring to enigmail >> instead, >> maybe suggesting that we shouldn't delay the enigmail updates, i.e. we should >> block the thunderbird update until the enigmail changes are ready. >> >> Maybe I'm just being too dense, but if you could clarify which one you meant, >> I'd appreciate it. > > Sorry for being unclear - I meant that the Thunderbird and Firefox > updates were deployed quickly, without waiting for Enigmail to be > ready. So we should do the same with Jessie (upload FF and TB before > Enigmail) especially since we had a long ways to prepare ourselves and > indeed have a plan already.
Ack, pushed the new thunderbird now. Let me know if you need any help with the enigmail / gpg updates. Cheers, Emilio
