Hi again

Sorry for spamming. But I guess we should mark them as fixed when we
backport the whole thing.

// Ola

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:39, Ola Lundqvist <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Markus
>
> Thank you.
>
> Looks like we should mark CVE-2019-1786, CVE-2019-1785 and CVE-2019-1798
> as not affecting jessie since it is a vulnerability that was introduced
> in 0.101.0.
> Or do I misunderstand something?
>
> // Ola
>
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:34, Markus Koschany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ola,
>>
>> Am 31.03.19 um 16:19 schrieb Ola Lundqvist:
>> > Hi Markus (and the rest of the LTS team)
>> >
>> > I saw that you added clamav to data/dla-needed.txt. Do you have more
>> > information about these CVEs?
>> > Do you know if it is the fuzzes mentioned here?
>> > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav-devel/commits
>> >
>> > Also should we backport these fixes or simply backport the whole new
>> > release?
>> >
>> > // Ola
>>
>> We usually backport the latest upstream release for Jessie and Stretch.
>> They have blogged about it here:
>>
>> https://blog.clamav.net/
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
>
> --
>  --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
> |  [email protected]                    [email protected]            |
> |  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
|  [email protected]                    [email protected]            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to