"Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> writes: > I think you might want s/glibc/glib/g?
Odd. I am sure I read (and wrote) glibc everywhere. But now I see glib, which actually makes more sense. Did somebody just change the universe when I wasn't looking? :-) Disregard everything I said in that email, will make sure I check the correct package tonight. -- Brian May <[email protected]>
