138% sudo apt-get upgrade [sudo] password for jr: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back: firefox-esr-l10n-ar firefox-esr-l10n-ast firefox-esr-l10n-be firefox-esr-l10n-bg firefox-esr-l10n-bn firefox-esr-l10n-bs firefox-esr-l10n-ca firefox-esr-l10n-cs firefox-esr-l10n-cy firefox-esr-l10n-da firefox-esr-l10n-de firefox-esr-l10n-el firefox-esr-l10n-en-gb firefox-esr-l10n-eo firefox-esr-l10n-es-ar firefox-esr-l10n-es-cl firefox-esr-l10n-es-es firefox-esr-l10n-es-mx firefox-esr-l10n-et firefox-esr-l10n-eu firefox-esr-l10n-fa firefox-esr-l10n-fi firefox-esr-l10n-fr firefox-esr-l10n-ga-ie firefox-esr-l10n-gl firefox-esr-l10n-gu-in firefox-esr-l10n-he firefox-esr-l10n-hi-in firefox-esr-l10n-hr firefox-esr-l10n-hu firefox-esr-l10n-id firefox-esr-l10n-is firefox-esr-l10n-it firefox-esr-l10n-ja firefox-esr-l10n-kk firefox-esr-l10n-km firefox-esr-l10n-kn firefox-esr-l10n-ko firefox-esr-l10n-lt firefox-esr-l10n-lv firefox-esr-l10n-mk firefox-esr-l10n-mr firefox-esr-l10n-nb-no firefox-esr-l10n-ne-np firefox-esr-l10n-nl firefox-esr-l10n-nn-no firefox-esr-l10n-pa-in firefox-esr-l10n-pl firefox-esr-l10n-pt-br firefox-esr-l10n-pt-pt firefox-esr-l10n-ro firefox-esr-l10n-ru firefox-esr-l10n-si firefox-esr-l10n-sk firefox-esr-l10n-sl firefox-esr-l10n-sq firefox-esr-l10n-sr firefox-esr-l10n-sv-se firefox-esr-l10n-ta firefox-esr-l10n-te firefox-esr-l10n-th firefox-esr-l10n-tr firefox-esr-l10n-uk firefox-esr-l10n-vi firefox-esr-l10n-zh-cn firefox-esr-l10n-zh-tw 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 66 not upgraded.
-Thanks, Jim On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:49:27 -0500 Roberto C. Sánchez <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:35:55PM -0500, Jim Rosenberg wrote: > > Wow, thanks for the lightning quick response!! > > > > > When reporting problems like this it is really quite important to > > > include complete output. > > > > 127% apt-cache policy firefox-esr > > firefox-esr: > > Installed: 115.6.0esr-1~deb10u1 > > Candidate: 115.6.0esr-1~deb10u1 > > Version table: > > *** 115.6.0esr-1~deb10u1 500 > > 500 http://security.debian.org buster/updates/main amd64 > > Packages 500 http://security.debian.org/debian-security > > buster/updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > 91.12.0esr-1~deb10u1 500 > > 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster/main amd64 Packages > > > > 128% sudo apt update > > [sudo] password for jr: > > Hit:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease > > Hit:2 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease > > Hit:3 http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates > > InRelease Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates > > InRelease Hit:5 https://dbeaver.io/debs/dbeaver-ce InRelease > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > 66 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. > > > > 130% apt-get -s upgrade | grep upgraded > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 66 not upgraded. > > > > 131% apt-get -s --with-new-pkgs upgrade | grep upgraded > > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > > > > Your system doesn't seem to know anything of an unavailable firefox-esr > package (it seems to think that the candidate is 115.6.0esr-1~deb10u1). > > I'll repeat what I said in my last message: > > > > When reporting problems like this it is really quite important to > > > include complete output. > > You have chosen to run the output of 'apt-get -s upgrade' through 'grep' > so that it is not possible to tell what problem apt-get may have > encountered or what choice it made in deciding the viable upgrade > path(s). By sending the output through 'grep' you have only allowed us > to determine that 'apt-get' decided it could not upgrade 66 packages, > but it is not possible to determine how or why apt reached that > conclusion. > > Also, note that you have a third-party source in the mix (dbeaver.io) > and since you didn't provide the output of 'apt-get -s upgrade' it isn't > clear what influence (if any) the presence of that source is having on > the situation. > > Please provide the full output so that we can help you determine what is > going on. > > Regards, > > -Roberto > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez
