On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 12:45 +0200, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > On 14.10.25 12:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > bullseye isn't "a stable release" in that sense now though. It's > > LTS, > > and hasn't been managed by the Release Team in any way since that > > status changed. > > Oh, fun, so I won't step on your toes by removing it?
Not from an SRM perspective at least. > > [...] > > I have always assumed that one can't remove packages from a release > > once it moves to LTS, and would need to instead need to upload a > > new > > dummy package that removes the offending functionality / content. > > I am not sure but at least dak does not complain and is willing to > remove something. > Assuming that it works, the package would still be referenced in the Sources / Packages files for bullseye presumably, as there wouldn't have been a point release to re-generate / re-sign them, but would at least not be installable. Whether that's OK seems like an FTP Team decision. Regards, Adam
