Hi! Also patches for bookworm is ready for review :-)
Thanks! On 2026-07-29 12:04, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hello Jochen, > > Thanks for the review, I've already pushed the patches for bullseye, > I'm currently working on bookworm now, could you please meanwhile (and > if you have time) revew the bullseye patches? > > Thank you so much! > > > On 2026-07-22 17:59, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > > > * Emmanuel Arias <[email protected]> [2026-06-29 17:25]: > > > Hello team! > > > > > > I've prepared some patches to fix some CVE for bind9 [0]. Please, could > > > you > > > review it? > > > > > > In the order hand, I looked at CVE-2025-40777, and I didn't found a patch > > > for > > > 9.16, and the current patch listed in security-tracker is not so easy to > > > backport, any thought? > > > > > > > > > [0] > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/packages/bind9/-/tree/debian/bullseye > > > > debian/patches/0047-Skip-deny-answer-address-for-non-IN-addresses.patch is > > missing from debian/patches/series. > > > > I did not follow the patches too deeply given upstream still maintains the > > branch. > > > > Looks ok to me over all. > > > > There are patches for a couple new CVEs in > > https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/tree/bind-9.16 > > > > Cheers Jochen > > > > -- > cheers, > Emmanuel Arias > > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ [email protected] > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 > > ⠈⠳⣄ -- cheers, Emmanuel Arias ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ [email protected] ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1 ⠈⠳⣄
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
