Hi Adrian (and people from the list)! > You can check the list in http://www.livejournal.com/~amastronardi/ I > already debianized some of these packages.
I saw bioFOX there. I have renamed yesterday my RFP of bioFOX to an ITP. My Package is here: http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/med/biofox We have created our packages almost at the same time... :-) I didn't release it because I am not on my machine (I hate to say that, but I am using a Windows machine here, from my father... ahhhh), so I couldn't test it. There is a Linda warning too, that I don't know how to override: $ linda -i biofox_1.0.1-1_all.deb W: biofox; File /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/extensions/{fbfbf0bf-032e-427e-932d-0b000a34f168}/chrome/biofox.jar contained in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package. The file shown above is installed into /usr/lib, but the package that contains it is a architecture-independent package. This file should be installed into /usr/share instead. Also, bioFOX is released under MPL/GLP/LGPL and not Artistic. I will be on travel tomorrow and be back on tuesday. Back to my machine only on next monday... :-( Until there, you could take a look on both packages and take the better from both! ;-) When I return (tuesday), we can talk more about bioFOX, OK? :-) Cheers, Nelson A. de Oliveira __________________________________________________________________________ UOL Fone: Fale com o Brasil e o Mundo com at� 90% de economia. http://www.uol.com.br/fone
