On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
[Karsten, please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in CC.]
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 01:23:51PM +0200, Christian Heller wrote:
medicine::pms
medicine::his
medicine::doc::requirements
medicine::doc::standards::openehr (part of CEN/TC251)
medicine::doc::standards::hl7
medicine::doc::standards::hdtf
medicine::doc::standards::edifact
medicine::doc::standards::xdt (future standard in Germany is SCIPHOX)
medicine::doc::standards::hxp
medicine::doc::standards::dicom
What's the point of tagging
hl7-rimX-1.4.deb
as "medicine::doc::standards::hl7" ?
IOW why not tag the standards' docs packages
"medicine::doc::standards" and leave it at that ? I would
even argue to make do with "medicine::doc".
medicine
-> applied
-> pms
-> his
-> ris
-> research
-> ...
-> docs
-> ...
-> common
-> ...
?
I like the last one for DebTags.
On the other hand it is not really applicable for meta packages and thus I
have to rethink my last mail that I want to take over the DebTags scheme.
Thanks for your input
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
