Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > many thanks for the upload. Indeed, the reason why we used experimental
No problem. > is that we suspected that EMBOSS is not yet suitable for unstable from a > QA point of view. The problems with the libraries are a bit hard for me, > so do not hesitate to give a few more hints if you have more time. I put together a patch for both issues the other day, but something seems to have blocked my attempt to mail it out, so I've instead put it up at http://people.debian.org/~ucko/emboss_4.1.0-1.0.interdiff . At any rate, the unresolved references are pretty straightforward to address by taking care to set *LIBS and *LIBADD appropriately in the relevant Makefile.am files and rerunning automake1.9 (though you must then also adjust debian/rules to make install in the right order). The rpath entries, meanwhile, stem from configure's incorrect belief that amd64 systems look for system libraries (only) in /usr/lib64; I excised the relevant code. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]