Le Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > Am Montag, den 19.05.2008, 13:22 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > > > > I do not understand: the link you gave is for changelogs. > > Yeah, exactly. And a Changelog entry is nothing else than a change > description ... exactly what you try to achieve - describe, what apatch > does/changes. As I told in this thread I would recommend a good patch > description in debian/changelog (a changelog), because it is the first > place one will look for. And you can use the same patch/change > description you put in the changelog also in the patch. It makes it easy > to understand, where something has changed and why.
In the end, why not, but I would prefer to settle on the format that will emerge from the discussion on -devel (and the one I proposed is very similar for the moment). So maybe you can make your suggestion there? Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
