Andreas, On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> I have just release GDCM 2.0.6. See link for more info: >> >> http://gdcm.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/GDCM_Release_2.0#GDCM_2.0.6 >> >> I have completely rework the debian/* files so the package should be a >> valid debian package out of the box. > > Many thanls for keeping us informed. I'll just have a look onto this. > I don not remember whether I mentioned in previous mails that keeping > the debian directory in the upstream source is depreciated for several > reasons. If you are interested I could try to assemble a list of > several postings on Debian related lists. Another problem I'm currently > facing by this approach is that Debian Med packaging policy says that > only the difference to the upstream source should be kept in Debian Med > SVN, which is in principle the debian directory. But what should I > put into SVN if debian is part of the upstream source? > > If you are convinced that shipping the debian dir with upstream source > is not a really clever way and want to store it rather in our SVN, just > tell me and I'll grant you access.
Apparently with the newer format any debian/ directory will simply be discarded: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg261687.html So that should answer your question: simply pretend my initial work on those debian/* files does not exist. If you are happy with how I wrote those debian/* files, then yes I could upload them on your SVN server. Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
