Le Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:47:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> In that case, med-config is mabye not the best choice. > > Well, name wise it is not really the best choice. > It is just the case that each med-* package depends from it which > might be an advantage to avoid adding addtional dependencies. > >> How about a `med-policy' >> package that would contain the README.source and our group policy? > > I was hesitant to add another "small" package. Unfortunately my work > on med-doc which I had planet for DebConf (and traveling) was not even > startet. This might have been another reasonable target package for > such documents - even if I would not really love to make many packages > dependant from a lot of Debian Med documentation.
Hi Andreas, I think that the issue is more to make our source pakcages build-depend on something, rather than having the binary packages depending on it, since README.source is not present in them. `med-doc' indeed seems a good target for providing our group policy and a document referred by README.source (in the end, why not our policy itself?). Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
