On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:29:16 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:41:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > here is a mail explaining that many of our debian/rules files are > > suboptimal. I will update our group policy and apply changes where > > necessary. But do not hesitate to do it before I start ;) > > > QUILT_STAMPFN = quilt-stamp > > > > $(QUILT_STAMPFN): > > touch $@ > > > > patch: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) > > > > build: build-stamp > > build-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN) > > Personally, I'd rather keep implementation details like quilt out of > debian/rules target names, and call that stampfile build-stamp is > depending upon "patch-stamp" rather than "quilt-stamp" (via > $(QUILT_STAMPFN)).
That was an example debian/rules causing problems.
IMHO, the correct way is:
---8<---
include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
configure: configure-stamp
configure-stamp: $(QUILT_STAMPFN)
...
build: build-stamp
build-stamp: configure-stamp
...
--->8---
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
