On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd vote against shipping the very same code in two different > orig.tar.gz tarballs. So if really needed (and upstream does not > find a way to change their build system) I would vote for adding > dicomscope to the dcmtk package and build an extra binary package. > But I have my doubts about this procedure because it implicitely > means that dcmtk is either not flexible enough to use or thet > dicomscope does not use dcmtk properly and IMHO this is no good > quality measure.
dicomscope was written by the dcmtk team. So I would say they understand what they are doing. But this is true I simply followed the build instructions as found in the dicomscope package (unix section). I have not investigated whether this would be possible to build dicomscope outside of dcmtk. -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
