On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Steve M. Robbins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:08:33PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Just FYI: >> >> http://gdcm.svn.sf.net/viewvc/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/vtk/ >> >> Just like there is an insighttoolkit in debian-med, does it make sense >> to have an unofficial vtk package in debian-med ? > > Just for clarity: the insighttoolkit in the debian-med SVN repository > is the OFFICIAL source of Debian packages of ITK. There's nothing > unofficial about it.
ooops... I meant to say dcmtk :) dcmtk is AFAIK *un*officially maintained in debian-med, right ? > I'm not sure it makes sense to have UNofficial packaging of anything > in debian-med. Is that a common practice? That's my question... > Coincidentally, a couple of days ago I asked the vtk maintainer > whether he would be interested in group maintenance of VTK. However, > I suggested pkg-scicomp rather than debian-med as VTK isn't > particularly "medical". ok. but this is getting confusing: insighttoolkit is in debian-med teem/kwwidgets is in debian-science vtk would be in scicomp and slicer (which need vtk/itk/teem/kwwidgets) is in ... debian science :) oh well in the end it should work, the problem that I can see is synchronization. Anyway Dominique Belhachemi says he would be trying my vtk package. That would solve some issue as slicer requires some volumerendering stuff from vtk 5.2 -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
