On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > >> A quick update. I am done with the packaging of dicomscope (I >> think). Thanks to the help of the OFFIS team, I integrated the 3.6.0 >> release of there dicomscope. So even if the latest available src zip >> from their ftp server is 3.5.1, in the end the package will contains >> all bug fixes and new features from the 3.6.0 release ! Big thanks to >> OFFIS team for that ! > > many thanks for your work on this and it is really great to hear about > active upstream projects.
'active' :) dicomscope 3.6.0 was released ~2003 > As you might have noticed I have commited > some changes to SVN. Then I tried to build the package using pbuilder > to make sure that the package builds in a clean environment. I noticed > that there is some problem with > > Build-Depends: sun-java6-jdk | sun-java5-jdk > > and thus I tried the following patch: > > Index: control > =================================================================== > --- control (Revision 2929) > +++ control (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > DM-Upload-Allowed: yes > Uploaders: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> > Priority: extra > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), cmake, libdcmtk1-dev, sun-java6-jdk | > sun-java5-jdk, > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), cmake, libdcmtk1-dev, openjdk-6-jdk, > libssl-dev, libxml2-dev, tofrodos, quilt > Standards-Version: 3.8.0 > Vcs-Browser: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/dicomscope/trunk/?rev=0&sc=0 > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > Package: dicomscope > Architecture: any > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, tk8.3 | tk8.4, libdcmtk1, > libssl0.9.8, > - libxml2, sun-java5-jre | sun-java6-jre > + libxml2, java2-runtime > Description: The OFFIS DICOM Viewer > DICOMscope is a free DICOM viewer which can display uncompressed, > monochrome DICOM images from all modalities and which supports > > which I have stolen from imagej which works fine with openjdk. I have no > experience > with Java and I actually have no idea why pbuilder fails to resolve the > dependencies > properly. But we should aim at openjava anyway if possible because > otherwise > dicomscope would have to go to contrib because it uses non-free components. > Could > you please verify whether this is possible? It should be possible. However it looks like cmake does not work out of the box with openjdk-6-jdk. I tried a patch (I cannot test, as I am on stable here), could someone please report any issue ? Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
