Le Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:48:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> Modified: trunk/packages/phyml/trunk/debian/changelog >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/packages/phyml/trunk/debian/changelog 2009-04-30 20:57:26 UTC >> (rev 3339) >> +++ trunk/packages/phyml/trunk/debian/changelog 2009-04-30 23:56:12 UTC >> (rev 3340) >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> -phyml (21042009-1) unstable; urgency=low >> +phyml (30042009-1) unstable; urgency=low > > If upstream does not have a real version numbering and we have > to invent our own version numbers this is always a bad thing. > But in this case a very unpractical numbering was choosen. > You should always use a YYYYMMDD version sequence if you are > coding the date into the version number. The rationale > behind this si that you can easily increase those numbers but > you can not for instance a checkout of today would have a > smaller version number.
Hi Stéphane, first of all, good news: phyml was accepted in Debian a few minutes ago. It will be much much easier for us to track your future updates if you would invert your versionning dates: YYYYMMDD instead of DDMMYYYY. Of course, other versionning schemes are fine as well, provided that their numerical sorting matches their chronological sorting. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
