To better reflect a remark from Micro, I have been changing the current naming convention of the C# gluelib for gdcm:
$ dpkg -L libgdcm-cil ... /usr/lib/libgdcm-cil/gdcm_csharp.dll ... will becomes (in gdcm 2.0.12): /usr/lib/libgdcm-cil/gdcm-sharp.dll Is there anything special I should do to make sure upgrade goes smoothly in the debian package. Ref: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mirco Bauer <[email protected]> Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM Subject: Re: CLI packaging: glue module location? > How about gdcm_csharp.dll ? Is this something people will be > comfortable with ? Hm? You wrote the C# binding for gdcm? Using C# in the lib name is very wrong in all cases. The CIL bytecode can be used by any language that targets the CLI. To give some examples: VB.NET, Boo, Nemerle (yes, those are all in debian already :)). There is a common prefix of nFOO (like nunit or nant) and for bindings even more common is the suffix of FOO-sharp (not -csharp) like gtk-sharp, gnome-sharp, evolution-sharp. -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
