On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:40:48AM +0100, James Bonfield wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:47:42PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Dear James and Andreas, > > > > I was still unsure on the versionning scheme, so I decided to upload a > > package > > called libstaden-read0 because with the libtoolisation patch I applied, the > > soname version is 0.0.0. This leaves room for uploading new packages with > > name > > libstaden-read1 or libstaden-read-1.11, once I can figure out how to > > instruct > > the build system to do the right thing. Can sonames have a decimal part, > > like > > libstaden-read.so.1.11? > > I'm unsure if sonames can have decimal points, but I think it would be > confusing to have an soname of libstaden-read.so.0 when the library > version is clearly 1.x.
If there was no dynamic library before, the (dynamic) library version (i.e., the digits after .so) should be 0.0.0. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
