Hello, following up the idea of Andreas to flag those software packages that ask for a registration of their users, I skimmed through the tango-icon-theme package and found the following icons that I thought to fit:
/usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/emotes/face-angel.png (also found here in large https://sharesource.org/svn/phoneme/theme/png/256x256/face-angel.png) I found it to fit rather nicely since we are requested to to be nice and register /usr/share/icons/Tango/32x32/devices/stock_mic.png (in large http://municipality.zlatograd.com/tango-icons/stock_mic.png) since we are opening a channel to talk back to upstream, I found this mike to be also rather nice. I would be prepared to follow Michael's suggestion to flag debian/control files with a separate URL for the registration and parse that information for the pure-blends' package presentation scripts. Is there speaking much against such a pilot? Or should it rather be a comment in the description in analogy to the introduction of the " Homepage:" indication? Many greetings Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
