On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Mathieu > Malaterre<[email protected]> wrote: >> Could someone please sponsor the pvrg package, I have cleanup the >> remaining lintian issues. > > Not fully clean :-) > See the attached lintian output. > > Wouldn't it be better to have the source package and the binary > package as "pvrg-jpeg" instead "pvrg" only, since pvrg is "Portable > Video Research Group" and you aren't packaging a "group", right? :-) > > (The program could also be installed as "pvrg-jpeg" too) > > Also, patch the manpage. > Since you are renaming the program to pvrgjpeg, it would be good to > have its manpage also updated (replace jpeg -> pvrgjpeg; for example, > manpage says to type "jpeg -d -s image.jpg", while it should be > patched to "pvrgjpeg -d -s image.jpg") > > And while building it, there are a lot of warnings about "implicit > declaration of function". > I didn't verify, but maybe it could fails to build with gcc 4.4 > If yes, then you will need to patch the sources to include the needed headers.
Should be all done. I tried compiling with gcc-snapshot and it compiled ok (tons of warnings though). Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
