On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 01:42:37PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Andreas Tille <[email protected]> [2009-11-24 13:24]: > > > The package praat is listed as part of the psychology task of Debian > > Med[1]. I wonder if it might make sense to put it under group > > maintenance of either the Experimental Psychology Maintainers team > > (fits probably best) or if there is no interest in the Debian Med team. > > This might be helpful to make sure that we are not lagging behind > > upstream (if there is no reason to stick to a certain version which > > should be mentioned on the tasks page). > > > > Rafael, what do you think about this? We would welcome new team > > members and have good experience in team maintenance. > > The praat package may also interest the members of the Debian Science > Team. > > At any rate, the praat package should not remain abandoned in Debian. It > is highly actively maintained upstream and has a good user basis among > speech scientists.
+1 praat is essential for psychological research on speech perception. The package should live where it would get the most attention -- regardless of the name of the team. ExpPsy can take it. However, we are probably the smallest of all candidate teams. So, if there is a chance that it would be better off staying in -science or -med that would be the preferred choice, IMHO. Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
