On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:07:00PM +0100, Adrian Midgley (Gmail) wrote: > I typed > > svn http://svn.clinrisk.co.uk/opensource/qrisk2/ > > at a command prompt, moved into the directory which resulted, made the > executables as above and then ran one.
So this is the same as I can confirm. I also noticed that a library libirisk.a is builded. My assumption is that the executables just use this library. I wonder whether it makes sense to build an interface to this library from GNUmed instead of calling the exeutables. > > Moreover the URL http://www.clinrisk.co.uk/ seems to feature a > > downloadable Windows executable but no source nor license. > > Give it time. Sure. ;-) > > Did you run a native GUI or did you found a CGI script? > > Command line. > > It might be shelled from a Windows client running a terminal instance to > a back end written in MUMPS, or from a Windows executable working back > to an xBase and MS Access set of databases in most existing use. Your assumption seems to be in line with my suggestion to build a GNUmed interface to the library (or the command line executables - whatever seems to be more easy to implement / reliable). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
