On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:19:08AM +0200, Andreas (Debian) wrote: > as you can see, FreeDiams is now listed as "In new queue":
Great. > http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/data > > The fact that it serves perfectly as plugin into GNUmed and other > practice management software let me think that it should also be listed > in the med-practice task +1 > (there is no problem in using packages in more > than one task - we have another example with aeskulap). I didn't know that. > However, I wonder what you think about the medical data task itself? I think FreeDIAMS doesn't belong there. It provides a lot of functionality beyond just data. > Would you consider this task as useful? Besides FreeDiams we are only > refering to Drugref.org which seems to be a basically dead project. We > want to provide a task categorisation which has practical use and > relevance but I have to trust medical experts (that's why I'm actually > mentioning the medical doctors in the To field) whether this is really > the case with the current med-data task. Healthcare *science* will have useful applications for the medical-data task. > The only pro for FreeDiams in a separate task would be if the question: > "Does it makes sense to use FreeDiams *outside* a medical practice?" One could construe use cases but they aren't truly relevant. > would be answered with yes. So there might actually people who are > just working with the data somehow. If this is not really a practical > case I'd consider droping the med-data task. Fine with me. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
