> In fact Aeskulap seems to be dead upstream - at least there was no new > code from upstreams since years. There is another project which is > perhaps comparable: > > http://www.orcero.org/irbis/kradview/
kradview couldn't do what aeskulap was able to do for me last time I looked. In fact, kradview isn't even installable anymore in a recent Debian AFAICT which simply kills it as far as GNUmed is concerned. > So perhaps spending some time into comparing these two projects (I > personally have no real idea how to compare the features) might make > sense. If it turns out that kradview is better than Aeskulap we should > perhaps restart the packaging effort of this Package an already-dead project because it seems better than an already-packaged, also-dead project ? Hey, why not :-) > or even a more reasonable project suggested by > our medical imaging experts??? There is none that I am aware of that are of interest to GNUmed (clinical diagnostic radiology viewer rather than scientific imaging). How about just doing a well described, limited-in-scope assignment-type project with a known, immediately useful outcome ? That would be my suggestion anyway. Karsten -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
