On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:18:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Yes, we definitely should do so. I also try to point out that DebiChem > and Debian GIS now are using the Blends techniques and I will care for > the according sections (and hope it will not blur the document to much).
If we focus on significant achievements rather then forcing a paragraph for every sub-project/blend in Debian I don't see us in danger of blurring the release notes. If we don't succeed with that, I'm sure we'll face opposition from its maintainers. > > If people want, we can coordinate that work on a wiki page and I can take > > care of merging things into a docbook-format patch to the release notes. > > Alternatively, you can also simply post snippets on the list and I'll > > harvest them. > > IMHO the "snippets and harvest" method would make the most effort for you > and thus I would not suggest this. If you volunteer to transform Wiki to > docbook I think Wiki is fine. Alternatively we might use > > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/community > > to edit the docbook file but that's a matter of taste and you might decide > yourself. Whatever gets most responses? "Entscheidend ist was hinten raus kommt!" [German ex-heavy weight champion] Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100924110725.ga8...@meiner
