On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:32:04AM +0200, Eric MAEKER wrote:
>
> Ok. I'll make changes, prepare the source package (that I must rename) and
> send it to the google code server. So that we can rebuild and upload the new
> beta.
If the source will be renamed we need to change debian/watch as well to
get notification about the new version.
> I put below a todo changes designed to limit the use of my memory (actually
> overused).
> * For the final 0.5.0, documentation will not be automatically generated
> during the compilation phase. It is now available as a wiki on the site
> FreeMedForms. I need to export it and put it in sources. The beta still uses
> the old documentation.
You have two options for the release tarball:
1. Release one (official!) source tarball which contains the
documentation from the Wiki.
2. Release two (official!) tarballs with one containing the
freediams code and one freediams-doc tarball.
Whatever you decide we should base the Debian packages on the official
tarball you are releasing and not on a mix from an officially released
tarball plus some "random" Wiki content.
> * The license has changed from new BSD to GPLv3.
OK.
> * Update the script for the source package generation.
This is somehow connected to the tarball decision above.
> I saw that the package depended FreeDiams GNU hurd? Is this a mistake / a
> needed one?
Where exactly did you found this? There might be a GNU hurd port for
freediams but I have not found a sign that this is currently the case.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
