Hi Charles, On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:09:38PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Log: > > Package needs some more manpages, it also needs testers
Just to explain my submit changelog entry: I just wanted to stress, that it is untested - a better wording would have been clarified this. There is at least one tester in my institute. > perhaps for a more systematic testing of new packages we could implement a > similar review system as the one I proposed for debian-mentors' sponsoring > requests ? This is a good idea anyway. > Since we already work as a team, we could simplify and just keep the > usertagging, to get a list of pending stuff to do. > > http://wiki.debian.org/PackageReview > > On the other hand, we could also (be the first to) use the proposed system as > it is, as it would be an opportunity to refresh our eyes with a broader > variety > of packages. I like this suggestion. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
