On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:12:36AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > Guess it depends on who makes that statement. We will see what the Ginkgo > > people have to say. > > "has been in use with Ginkgo for a while" == "is well tested"
I do not think that '== "is well tested"' is correct here. You would also need to verify that the patch for say wx does not break .... hmmm, say for example GNUmed client. > "applies cleanly" == "console output of applying the patch" Yes. Thanks for diving into this. This is very mauch apprechiated. I'm a bit short in time currently and wanted to write something similar. At any case I tried to explain the issue in the Remark in the paragraph on the tasks page: http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/imaging#ginkgo-cadx (which is lousy formated as I just see now :-() Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
