Um beginner, reporting in! On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:24:28PM +0100, Maximilian Haussler wrote: >> Isn't the real upstream of meta-velvet here: >> https://github.com/hacchy/MetaVelvet >> >> Based on: >> http://metavelvet.dna.bio.keio.ac.jp/index.html > > Ahh, thanks for the hint. > >> Looks like Daniel has a copy of meta-velvet inside velvet now, but I >> guess that the github site has the newest version... > > So the correct thing to do would be either: > > - Just strip this useless copy from velvet tarball (because > we are rebuilding it anyway) or > - Simply care for not installing the stuff in the binary package > > Does anybody think that packaging MetaVelvet makes sense as well. It > seems that most of the packaging stuff is quite similar to velvet and > should be a quite reasonable beginners task? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
