On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 17:05, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, that means one vote for cycle. Do your consider it to be better > than mencal?
Well, cycle is graphical and mencal isn't, but I've never used mencal, so I don't have opinion on that. > I'm fine with keeping software which has real users and no important > bugs. There is no reason to kick something if there are no obvious > problems. > > However, do you agree just to Suggest cylce and keep the only Depends > on pcalendar? Considering the situation, I must agree. :) But, I didn't install cycle as a dependency of anything, so if it's in Debian it is not a problem. > >> maybe there are more people who don't like Java. :) > > On the other hand if it is the only reason to not use a certain end user > application because it is written in some programming language this will > end up in severe flaws at some point in time. > This is just my practice not to install Java programs. Eventually, I will probably end up installing it when I don't have other choice. :) Karolina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CADh3fJnPR_F_-BDumT6Q17TWB8A29OVbi_74vg8xG=gz37k...@mail.gmail.com
