On Friday, November 11, 2011 09:42:23 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Sebastian Hilbert > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:55:51 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > >> > On Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:03:09 AM Steffen Möller wrote: > >> > > Sorry for saying the obvious here, but if the bug is not > >> > > Debian-specific, then it should go to ITK upstream. > >> > >> I definitely encourage that patches for upstream bugs be sent > >> upstream. > >> > >> > The question was more along the lines if Debian packages accept > >> > patches which upstream refuses (have not checked with upstream ITK > >> > but have had issues with wxwidgets). > >> > >> It's common for Debian to have patches not in upstream. Often, in my > >> experience, it's not because of upstream refusal but due to differing > >> priority or differing release cycles. I generally have a number of > >> patches for Boost that upstream takes multiple releases to > >> incorporate. > >> > >> If you have a patch for the problem, I encourage you to submit a > >> Debian bug report as well as the upstream one, and link them. > > > > Raising this problem upstream at Ginkgo I was pointed to > > > > this bug report against itk upstream > > > > https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/jira/browse/ITK-2457 > > > > The comment from Mathieu there made me check which gdcm libinsighttolkit > > depends on in Debian > > > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/libinsighttoolkit3.20 > > > > This however indicates that it already depends on gdcm 2.x > > > > which in turn means the bug is not fixed ? > > > > Supposedly most work is on itk4 which might make the problem go away. > > That's correct. ITK in debian has not been using the old GDCM 1.x > where a static buffer was used to decompress JPEG segment since years. > ITK uses a thread safe implementation in GDCM 2.x. I would think the > issue is not the one described in bug ITK-2457 > > HTH
Now that I think of it upstream release 2.6.0 seems to work better. I will follow up on this when this is packaged for Debian. Has the patch mentioned ever made it into ITK ? Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
