On 12/15/2011 01:24 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:47:23AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: >> The license is the typical "non-commercial" one. I spoke with >> Nick Patterson from upstream, a Debian user himself, who is happy >> with us redistributing their work. > Did he said that he will try to enhance the licensing issue? Rather the contrary. >> The upload went to experimental. > Why? Because of the missing man pages mentioned below. Also, some gut feeling of mine wanted to wait for reactions from the build deamons.
Also, I was not sure if some of the example scripts should possibly move to /usr/bin in a more abstract form, i.e. the way I use them locally. >> There is quite some documentation to read through, but no man >> pages. And I do not have the time to fix that. Some good soul >> adding a "-h" option to the tools and perform a help2man would >> be much appreciated. This could be something for an eventual >> Code-in project, I think, anyway, IMHO the package should not >> go to main without them. > HINT, HINT, HINT for newcommers who wonder what contribution they > could provide: Use help2man to create some manpages. We should have a page with such educative time sinks and explicitly address the hidden talents on high schools with such. Best, Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
