Hi Nicolas, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:30:57PM +0100, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote: > It might be in the psychology task but it is more related to > electrophysiology but it does not exist debian-med.
You are right, we do not have a electrophysiology. I think this would to much reach out into NeuroDebian field (feel free to correct me). As far as I know NeuroDebian maintains some metapackages in Debian Science and currently I do not really see any reason to duplicate this work. It might make sense to let med-psychology suggesting those metapackages from Debian Science. What do you think? > Another possibility would be imaging-dev. So I *Suggested* it in imaging-dev (because you are speacking about "possibility"). In fact I suggested "libeeg-dev" just wild guessing that the final development package will get this name - please correct me if my guess was wrong. > Another question: I have other packages that could fits in some of the > tasks. Should I ask to you to include them in the tasks? Yes please! Whatever you do which might be of relevance for medical care in a wider sense, please at least drop us a note. Subscribing this list would be nice to possibly influence some discussion but I do not want to ask you for this in case you have hard time constraints and can not read this list. > I think in > particular about libxdffileio-dev: > http://packages.debian.org/sid/libxdffileio-dev > which could fit in Medical data or imaging development. Is a "Suggests" correct as well or would you rather consider a "Recommends"? Any further remark is really welcome Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
