Hello all, On 08/04/2012 06:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:32:48PM +0000, Steffen Möller wrote: >> Author: moeller >> Date: 2012-08-03 14:32:48 +0000 (Fri, 03 Aug 2012) >> New Revision: 11983 >> >> Log: >> Adding build instructions for psipred - another of those tools besides >> VMD or Rosetta that cannot be redistributed in our distribution but >> ships with source code. > > Could you please be more verbose about this. http://debianmed.blogspot.de/2011/04/debian-med-individuals-expertize-and.html I installed I-TASSER locally because of the 1500AA limit of the I-TASSER web interface. And I-TASSER requests the installation of psipred. > Do we want to advertise the packaging on the tasks pages - if yes I would > suggest to use > > Files: * > Copyright: 1995-2012 David T. Jones, UCL, London <xxx> > License: non-redistributable > > because the license short name will be printed on the tasks page. This is a nice idea. Yes, we should. Could we have that as "non-redistributable source code" or something better? > Did anybody try or does anybody intend to try asking upstream authors > for a more liberal licence? I kind of have, yesterday, but it certainly helps if someone else asks again. We should not care too much, though, since with the PredictProtein suite we have such a secondary structure prediction somewhere with us already. I cannot name the exact tool, but Laszlo can. Many thanks and regards, Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
