Le Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30:12PM +0200, [email protected] a écrit : > > Too bad.... > We could indeed package a libsnappy1.0.3-java (with a conflict on > libsnappy-java, and a recommends on picard-tools) and make picard-tools > depend on this version.
Hi Olivier and Andreas, first of all, many thanks for your work on this. For libsnappy-java, since it still only has 10 Popcon users, of which I already contribute 2 or 3 points because I develop on multiple machines, we can also do something very "dark side", that is a) downgrade libsnappy-java to 1.0.3 using an epoch, and b) request its removal from Wheezy. Note to the other readers: this is really something that usually should not be done. Please forget what you read ! What do you think ? -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
