Re Emotiv: Their site greets me with this:
"Conduct research with EEG by licensing our Testbench software and SDK to obtain our *proprietary* software toolkit." ... which describes precisely why I set out to do aghermann in the first place. But I digress I suppose. I'm not sure I understood your question, though. If it is about whether aghermann can read and work with the signal recorded by their gear, then yes, it can; however, some signal conversion would be required (they save the EEG signal in some "binary EEGLAB" format, but I'm sure converters exist to turn it into EDF, which is a kind of standard in sleep research). Or if the question is about how reliably aghermann can determine whether a subject is asleep? Then hey, it's as reliable and as accurate as you implement it in lua! That's the whole point of making it "1.0" :} Technically, I expose enough signal properties for the lua script to be able to score (a classic 30-sec page) as NREM1-4, REM or Wake according to the guidelines of Rechtschaffen & Kales (1968). By all means, if I didn't answer your question, please rephrase so I could try again? On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:00:07 -0500 Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > wow -- cool -- congrats! I will review and initiate build > > btw -- somewhat ignorant question -- how sensitive your analysis > pipelines? e.g. would it work with something as basic as Emotiv's > systems? > > > On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, andrei zavada wrote: > > > Hi Yaroslav, > > > Aghermann upstream is proud, and much relieved, do deliver version 1.0, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131116232521.2b0b3177@ra
