i havent followed the whole discussion but agree that it would be nice to
separate our testing data entirely from the source, as yarik suggests, at
least for ANTs.

i have been struggling a bit with testing lately, specifically, testing
combinations of parameters on combinations of data.   is there any
new/better approach to this?   if i am going to put effort into this, then
would like to improve the testing situation, in general, if possible.


brian




On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Matthew McCormick wrote:
> > >> @Yaroslav, the script we use for creating the ITK tarballs [3] may be
> > >> a useful reference for creating an ANTS data tarball.
>
> > > Thank you Matthew, we might make use of its parts... but while at it I
> > > would like to raise a concern actually about shipping those relatively
> > > large data volumes used for testing WITHIN the source tarballs...  Do
> > > you expect those to get modified (grow/change) with each ITK release?
> > > ATM those data samples occupy big (if not majority) of the
> > > compressed tarball IIRC.
>
> > > May be that data could get a life of its own? ;)  i.e. may be we could
> > > better package "working set" of test images used by ITK/ANTs (else?)
> and
> > > distribute a dedicated package with only data?  I eventually see it
> > > possible that data(set) stabilizes more than code which keeps
> developing
> > > reusing those data files
>
> > > P.S. That is what Michael (of NeuroDebian) has done to other big
> > > projects such as AFNI, FSL etc -- we barely ever update the data
> > > packages but code packages get updated quite often now without
> incurring
> > > any major penalty of dragging the same data around
>
>
> > The testing data is included with the source tarballs so that the
> > source tarball can be downloaded and the tests can be readily run
> > without any extra effort and without a network connection.
>
> > The testing data will vary with releases.  Most of the data are not
> > input images but baseline, i.e. ground truth, images used when
> > verifying the output of a test.
>
> Fair enough if data is to change with releases and tarballs remain the
> ultimate form of "sources" -- thank you Matthew.
>
> Brian -- is that to be the case with ANTs?  then would you be so kind to
> provide similar tarball distribution bundled with data?
>
> Cheers!
> --
> Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
>

Reply via email to