Hi Thorsten I would be happy to take a look at the copyright contents. However, I am a bit new to this so not exactly sure which bits are missing. Not trying to be dense, just not sure. Maybe Andreas or you could point me in the right direction and I can fix things. Aha, the copyright needs the jebl authors as well I am guessing?
As for jebl being a separate package, it is a bit complicated. The original one is no longer maintained (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jebl/) though this older one is the one that is included in phyutility. Seems like those sources aren't even available anymore. There is an updated (https://code.google.com/p/jebl2/) one, but this is not the one used by phyutility. So from phyutility's perspective, I am not sure it would be helpful to have jebl2 as a package. Again, new to this, so happy to do whatever is best. Take care, Stephen On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:17:18PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > thanks to Andreas I learned today that I need to write more emails and that > phyutility is going to be uploaded soon. > Before this upload, can you please have a closer look at the (yet) > incomplete contents of debian/copyright. > Would it make sense to create a separate package from the included jebl > library? > > Thorsten > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1403162158340.12...@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140317023842.GC3808@localhost.localdomain