On 11/04/2014 09:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> Hi, >> after the discussions we had about mapsembler2 failing to build on a few >> archs, I have made a RM request on failing archs: >> #766961: RM: mapsembler2 [mips mipsel powerpc sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS >> >> Indeed failures are due to upstream code not working on those archs. >> >> Bug #765285 is in severity seious. Now that failing archs have been >> removed by ftpmasters, which severity should we set ? and possibly >> allowing move to testing. >> >> If I upload a new package version (same source), do you know if removed >> tags of failed archs will remained removed ? Or shall I specify in >> control file the (un)supported archs ? > The only way to get this mapsembler2 version in is to either close the > bug or decrease the severity. A new upload will keep mapsembler2 out > from Jessie. FTBS archs have been removed, but I do not think it is enough to lower the severity to let it go to testing. I could upload a new "debian" version filling the Architecture field with archs expecting to work.
Olivier > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
